Hi everybody,
First congratulation for the product, it is very great!
I have a suggestion for create a new Javascript rule or update the
rule "Function names should comply with a naming convention":
Some of my developers do not respect naming conventions for
naming functions, most of time they define functions like this:
onTextfieldChange1111111: function(field, newValue, oldValue, eOpts) {
...
}
And it looks like this method doesn't fire the rule "Function
names should comply with a naming convention".
After asking this question on StackOverflow
(http://stackoverflow.com/questions/29937532/sonarqube-javascript-rule-function-names-should-comply-with-a-naming-convention),
it looks like this rule doesn't check functions that are defined
like this, it only check functions defined like:
function
onTextfieldChange1111111
(....){
I think this is almost a bug, because this way of naming
functions is correct in Javascript, so this rule should works.
Thanks in advanced for your help and sorry for my bad english...
Best regards
--
Sylvain Jeandroz
CEO-Vision
<a style="color:#999999;" href="callto:+33668452095">+33 6 68 45
20 95
[hidden email]